Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
IceZeroZero9

Need Help Choosing Which Plasma To Get To Replace Crt

79 posts in this topic

Hey guys, I need to get a Plasma for my parents as their CRT TV crapped out. Their budget is about $1000-$1100 and I was looking at two 50 inch screens. The Panasonic TH-P50U30A (can get this for $1070 with 5 year Extended Warranty) and the Samsung PS51D550C1M (probably about $1300 with EW). I just wanted to ask would the Samsung be worth getting over the Panasonic? Would the quality be much better or worth going over the budget to get that instead? 3D is a non factor, so not sure how the rest stacks up against each other when you exclude the 3D.

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
do they need Full HD?

you can get the 51D450 Sammy for about $680, which is a great buy.

They don't need full HD set, but I thought it'd be better to get a full HD set.

I'll put that Samsung on the list though and look into it. If that was the budget though I probably would have bought the Panasonic 42 inch TH-P42U30A for $689 last week as that's full HD. I don't own a Plasma myself, and am just going off of the difference between 720p and 1080p content on my computer screen. How does this look on TVs that are 50 inch in size? Is it noticeable going from 720p - 1080p?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is it noticeable going from 720p - 1080p?
Not especially. I find it quite amazing how noticeable changes in resolution are on a (small) PC screen but the same content is much better on a standard TV.

You also need to take into account sitting distance and viewer age. Sitting back about 2m from a 50" screen will mean that the human eye can't really get any benefit from say 720p versus 1080p. Also as you get older your eyesight gets worse. So for many older people "True HD" looks no different than even good "SD". You should also think about what sort of TV is being watched. If its mostly FTA then 720p is about as good as broadcasts get. In general unless you're using Blurays then 1080p is of limited value anyway.

Anyway, put it all together and a 50" 720p TV will offer almost the same viewer experience as a 1080p one. Its up to the individual whether spending half as much again is worth the marginal PW improvements.

Regards

Peter Gillespie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
only if you're sitting very close, like under 2m away...

Viewing distance would be about 2m.

Not especially. I find it quite amazing how noticeable changes in resolution are on a (small) PC screen but the same content is much better on a standard TV.

You also need to take into account sitting distance and viewer age. Sitting back about 2m from a 50" screen will mean that the human eye can't really get any benefit from say 720p versus 1080p. Also as you get older your eyesight gets worse. So for many older people "True HD" looks no different than even good "SD". You should also think about what sort of TV is being watched. If its mostly FTA then 720p is about as good as broadcasts get. In general unless you're using Blurays then 1080p is of limited value anyway.

Anyway, put it all together and a 50" 720p TV will offer almost the same viewer experience as a 1080p one. Its up to the individual whether spending half as much again is worth the marginal PW improvements.

I'm actually leaning towards the 720p screen now. The Samsung is definitely a 1365 x 768 resolution screen right? Not that new 1024 x 768 crap? I'm in WA so I've still got a couple of hours before the store shuts to make a decision.

So FTA TV is 720p? Is that as high as it gets?

Also, what resolution is Foxtel HD? Do they have 1080p content? Right now they have regular SD Foxtel, but if they want to upgrade I'm curious if Foxtel have any 1080p content. I assume movies might be 1080p and sport and other stuff is 720p?

Can you guys also tell me if the the Samsung PS51D550C1M is much better than the Panasonic TH-P50U30A if you exclude the 3D. I'm actually curious about that for myself as I might get one too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both Foxtel and FTA TV are a mix of 720p and 1080i - there's a case to be had that 720p can be better than 1080i (esp for sports etc.) but in the end both will look much of a muchness to most people. Don't assume anything with broadcast HD - its not based on 'common sense' but a mishmash of priorities. Currently FTA tend to show current HD shows on their SD main channel, while the HD channels are reserved for older SD content. :rolleyes: Only Blurays have 1080p content (and are likely to for the foreseeable future)

Could suggest it might be worth holding off a few days before making a purchase? The prices aren't going to go up and you've done a fairly large change in your sets of choice today.

Regards

Peter Gillespie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Could suggest it might be worth holding off a few days before making a purchase? The prices aren't going to go up and you've done a fairly large change in your sets of choice today.

What you mean by fairly large change in my sets of choice?

What I'd mainly like to know is if the Samsung PS51D550C1M is worth the extra $200 over the Panansonic TH-PU30A, unless you know of better specials in the next few days?

You've told me pretty much all I need to know about the 720p stuff and I don't need to know much more about the Samsung PS51D450C1M.

Are you saying there might be different TVs on special in the next few days? I've only got a Harvey Norman and a Goodguys locally since I am in Country WA so I am going off of their prices. The Panasonic TH-PU30A price was one I was given by HN last week for $1070 including 5 year warranty. They extended that offer for me until today as the special expired Sunday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Viewing distance would be about 2m.

I'm actually leaning towards the 720p screen now. The Samsung is definitely a 1365 x 768 resolution screen right? Not that new 1024 x 768 crap? I'm in WA so I've still got a couple of hours before the store shuts to make a decision.

So FTA TV is 720p? Is that as high as it gets?

Also, what resolution is Foxtel HD? Do they have 1080p content? Right now they have regular SD Foxtel, but if they want to upgrade I'm curious if Foxtel have any 1080p content. I assume movies might be 1080p and sport and other stuff is 720p?

Can you guys also tell me if the the Samsung PS51D550C1M is much better than the Panasonic TH-P50U30A if you exclude the 3D. I'm actually curious about that for myself as I might get one too.

I'm becoming increasingly sold on the lower resolution plasmas, especially with FTA and Foxtel standard definition broadcasts. I don't know why but the lower resolution sets seem to do a better job with this stuff. I have a 42" LG cheappie plasma in the spare room (1024 x 768) and its awesome with ironing out noise and artefacts on Foxtel SD. By comparison, my 55" LED FHD (which cost me a fortune) is absolutely hopeless with the standard def stuff.

I'm actually wondering whether the lower ressy plasmas do a good job because they are not attempting to upscale the compressed SD broadcasts to the 1080p panel?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm actually wondering whether the lower ressy plasmas do a good job because they are not attempting to upscale the compressed SD broadcasts to the 1080p panel?

Someone mentioned something like that to me before about a year or so ago. He said that we don't need anything better than that in Australia as the upscaling makes the image worse. I didn't really pay much attention as I wasn't looking to buy a TV back then. Would like to get an answer about that from someone who knows more about it though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm becoming increasingly sold on the lower resolution plasmas, especially with FTA and Foxtel standard definition broadcasts. I don't know why but the lower resolution sets seem to do a better job with this stuff. I have a 42" LG cheappie plasma in the spare room (1024 x 768) and its awesome with ironing out noise and artefacts on Foxtel SD. By comparison, my 55" LED FHD (which cost me a fortune) is absolutely hopeless with the standard def stuff.

I'm actually wondering whether the lower ressy plasmas do a good job because they are not attempting to upscale the compressed SD broadcasts to the 1080p panel?

First of all pixels are not "resolution", resolution is an analogue measure of what you can actually see. Real resolution is always much lower than the pixel count would suggest and even the best Bluray 1080p content is nowhere near 1080 visible resolution.

Foxtel/Austar is 1080i which for film source which has the potential to be exactly the same as 1080p however the content is pre filtered to lower the digital bandwidth required, the end result is visible resolution that is at best 720 and typically lower.

768 TV's (there are no 720p TV's) dont have an inherent advantage over 1080 TV's when displaying SD, the quality of the video processing and panel are what matters. If anything the extra upscaling required by a 1080 panel has the potential to improve quality if it is done well.

The reason your LED LCD looks bad with SD content is because its inherently of poor quality and has nothing to do with it being 1080.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Viewing distance would be about 2m.

I'm actually leaning towards the 720p screen now.

Don't buy a 720p screen at that distance, you'll regret it bigtime.

Even FTA HD will look hazy at that range, as the large pixel grid will become apparent.

I'd get the 50in 1080p U Panasonic as they make good plasma's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
768 TV's (there are no 720p TV's) dont have an inherent advantage over 1080 TV's when displaying SD, the quality of the video processing and panel are what matters. If anything the extra upscaling required by a 1080 panel has the potential to improve quality if it is done well.

The reason your LED LCD looks bad with SD content is because its inherently of poor quality and has nothing to do with it being 1080.

Thanks for clearing that up. I actually heard something similar to what PC9 said about a year or so ago.

Don't buy a 720p screen at that distance, you'll regret it bigtime.

Even FTA HD will look hazy at that range, as the large pixel grid will become apparent.

I'd get the 50in 1080p U Panasonic as they make good plasma's.

I actually went for the Panasonic, unfortunately they didn't have any stock left. They said they could order it in but that would take at least 10 days or so. They're going to call their contact over East tomorrow to check on that as it was too late in the day to call today.

What do you guys think? Should I leave it if it takes that long to get? A better special price might come up in that time, so not sure if I want to commit to buying it and waiting that long for it. What would you guys do?

I think I am OK with either the Samsung PS51D550C1M or Panasonic TH-P50U30A. Whichever one has the better price at the time of purchase is the one I'll get.

Edited by IceZeroZero9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think I am OK with either the Samsung PS51D550C1M or Panasonic TH-P50U30A. Whichever one has the better price at the time of purchase is the one I'll get.

Good idea....as for specials, anything is possible, but unlike a $4000 TV, the price drop won't be huge, so use boredom threshold as your guide.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
First of all pixels are not "resolution", resolution is an analogue measure of what you can actually see. Real resolution is always much lower than the pixel count would suggest and even the best Bluray 1080p content is nowhere near 1080 visible resolution.

Foxtel/Austar is 1080i which for film source which has the potential to be exactly the same as 1080p however the content is pre filtered to lower the digital bandwidth required, the end result is visible resolution that is at best 720 and typically lower.

768 TV's (there are no 720p TV's) dont have an inherent advantage over 1080 TV's when displaying SD, the quality of the video processing and panel are what matters. If anything the extra upscaling required by a 1080 panel has the potential to improve quality if it is done well.

The reason your LED LCD looks bad with SD content is because its inherently of poor quality and has nothing to do with it being 1080.

OK - you seem to know what you are talking about. I am getting rid of the LED and going back to a plasma. Previously I owned a couple of Samsung 58" plasmas (the most recent one a 3D version) but again they struggled a bit with the SD stuff, although they were clearly better than the LED with SD. My sole requirement is PQ (dont require 3D or smart TV capability or Blu ray) and at this stage I am think of going back to 50" plasma like the guy who posted this forum as I want to maximise PQ. Any suggestions for me please?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My sole requirement is PQ (dont require 3D or smart TV capability or Blu ray) and at this stage I am think of going back to 50" plasma like the guy who posted this forum as I want to maximise PQ. Any suggestions for me please?

What is your budget?

Is the room where you watch TV very bright (ie lots of windows)?

Would you consider a 55" plasma so you still have the same size screen as your LED?

There are plenty of plasmas around, and PQ will to some extent depend on your viewing environment. If you have a brightly lit room, then the higher end models (which unfortunately include 3D, smart apps etc) offer better anti-reflective coatings and screen filters to reduce reflections and improve blacks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What is your budget?

Is the room where you watch TV very bright (ie lots of windows)?

Would you consider a 55" plasma so you still have the same size screen as your LED?

There are plenty of plasmas around, and PQ will to some extent depend on your viewing environment. If you have a brightly lit room, then the higher end models (which unfortunately include 3D, smart apps etc) offer better anti-reflective coatings and screen filters to reduce reflections and improve blacks.

Thanks for your reply. I have a room which I can control the light and normally don't watch TV during the day. Budget is not an issue but I don't want to waste money on bells and whistles for the sake of it. What I would like is good blacks, contrast, ie the usual stuff one yearns for in a plasma am I am wondering if I can achieve this with a 1366 x 768 panel. Currently watch Austar (with HD) and FTA on VAST.

My reason for going down to the 50" was to maximise PQ but understand that the Panasonic plasma's do okay at 55". Previously owned 2 generations of Samsung 58" plasmas but tried Samsung and LG 55" LEDs, both which mangle most SD stuff.

PS: Apologies to the author of this post for the intrusion but I suspect he and I are probably looking for roughtly the same result.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My reason for going down to the 50" was to maximise PQ but understand that the Panasonic plasma's do okay at 55". Previously owned 2 generations of Samsung 58" plasmas but tried Samsung and LG 55" LEDs, both which mangle most SD stuff.
The only issue with FTA SD content on the Panasonic (and apparently now also the Samsungs) is that they overly soften the image. This is easily rectified if being fed the image via some sort of upscaling device (eg HD PVR, DVDR, BDR etc)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Panasonic's have always mangled SD and it seems current Samsung's do as well.

How well SD is deinterlaced and upscaled makes a big difference to the end result. If you have an Austar Mystar HD set top box set to 1080i output it must deinterlace and upscale and it will degrade the SD channels as it does not do a very good job. If you set the box to 576i output the TV will have to deinterlace and upscale SD which can be a problem on some displays as well.

A decent video processor would get around the limitations of many displays as would a good AV receiver.

I dont know what your viewing distance is but a 50" is small. I have used Foxtel-Austar SD as my primary viewing source for 11 years from a distance of 2.8 metres would not want to go down to a 50" for any reason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.