QUOTE (DrGlen @ Jun 15 2005, 10:58 PM)
Thanks for that comment, Birke. I am off to try to find the PCWorld article.
Look
(here) for the 8 reviews.
Be careful - these reviews really depend on what you are looking for - the number one screen (LG) has only 'middling' (to quote them) HD display quality in their review, whilst the number 8 screen (Fujitsu) has 'very good'.
Personally I would rather my panel displayed a great picture rather than sounded good.
They obviously liked the NEC though.
Lg - .... "But images appeared a bit noisy, and the 42PX4D came in a depressing next-to-last for its ability to display detail; consequently, it ranked only fifth out of the eight tested models for HDTV quality. At least some of the problem seems to be in its display of dark tones. In a high-def TV documentary about the Napa Valley wine country, for example, we saw speckles in what should have been a solid-blue sky. To investigate further, we watched the opening scene of Mystic River: a fade up from black over a grim Boston skyline. Much of the DVD has less-than-perfect image quality, making the sequence trying for any TV, but it looked especially splotchy on the LG."
Just goes to show - horses for courses
J.
One wonders whether they actually calibrated the displays, or did they just test them 'off the shelf'