G'day,
I'm after a TV for under $1000. The reason I am spending so little is that I am waiting until I move into a bigger house before I commit to a bigger screen (viewing distance is around 2.5 m), and I prefer CRT over plasma and LCD. So this TV is a temporary measure (about 1 year or so) until then.
I currently have a 10yr old Akai 68cm, which has functioned perfectly, and produced excellent images. However, it only has a single composite input, and does not display NTSC. Viewing "Return Of The King" over composite is a pain, and the lack of NTSC playback is bugging me (no R1 DVDs, for example).
I'm looking for component input, NTSC playback, and side A/V composite for connecting a video camera. I have a Pioneer 676a DVD player, and a TEAC DVB 350 SD set-top box. All video and audio outputs go to my Rotel RSP-1068 pre-processor, which allows component, S-Video, or composite video connection to the TV.
I could go for a 68cm TV (I bought a $500 LG 68cm for my parents recently, and picture quality was streets ahead of my current TV, especially when connecting the DVD via component). However, I would like to get a bigger screen size if possible, but I assume that best picture quality in this price range would be for a 68cm TV.
So I'm wondering if there are any decent 76cm widescreen or 80cm TVs in this price range. My only concern with the 76cm is that any 4:3 image would be smaller than the current image on my 68cm.
However, an 80cm TV would be roughly the same width as a 76cm widescreen, and allow larger 4:3 picture. I've got a few childrens DVDs that are 4:3, and as these are on repeatedly, I'd rather not reduce the image size.
So I guess the question is: for $1000, which TV should I get? A 68cm, 76cm, or 80cm? And can anyonce recommend some models to consider, or avoid?
--Geoff
