QUOTE (ohboy @ Apr 9 2005, 06:19 PM)
QUOTE (alebonau @ Apr 9 2005, 04:26 PM)
QUOTE (ohboy @ Apr 9 2005, 02:13 PM)
QUOTE (therashman @ Apr 9 2005, 01:02 PM)
Thinking out Loud hear:
969...................................................DV78
1. DVD............................................1. DVD
2. CD .............................................2. CD
3. HDMI
4. DVI
5. DVDA
6. Multiple Features
7. Blacks ?....................................Superb
Street price $1300.............................Street Price $1900
cost per item $1300/6.............................$1900/2
Cost per item $217.00.............................$950.00
Nuff said
cheers
what are you saying here ohboy the arcam 78 has more money spent per atribute versus the universal pio ?, please clarify as your post is just a bit cryptic.
also note the arcam that thrashman is talking about is the fmj29a
What I am saying Al, is "There is Quality" and "There is Quantity"
The 969 has the "Quantity"
The DV78 has the "Quality"
I am not saying the 969 is a bad player, it seems that pioneer has put all the bells and whistles into it, but not all the quality parts.
where as Arcam have concentrated on the P.Q and the S.Q alone, and not bells and whistles. IMHO.
cheers
I guess my point was that comparing Arcam 78 (or maybe even 79), Denon 2900, 3910 etc. to the Pioneer 969 is still OK !
But, comparing the CD SQ of any of the above machines to something that costs more than 3-4 times, like Arcam FMJ29a is flawed IMHO.....
Ritesh
