Austar Maybe Taken Over By Foxtel!
#26
Posted 27 May 2011 - 12:39 PM
#27
Posted 27 May 2011 - 03:00 PM
Skid_MacMarx, on May 26 2011, 10:28 AM, said:
Depends where you live. Most of WA doesn't yet have any local digital commercial tv - only analogue GWN & WIN.
For those people, Foxtel is a godsend. Why do you think Foxtel always kept WA and handed the other scraps to Austar? They knew where the subscriber numbers were almost the whole town.
#28
Posted 27 May 2011 - 04:38 PM
#29
Posted 27 May 2011 - 04:47 PM
unclewhimsy, on May 27 2011, 09:53 AM, said:
I am interested in the Foxtel equipment (IQHD etc) so I don't want to subscribe to Austar.
I am hoping that this deal has a positive effect on me getting Foxtel coverage/equipment now?? What do you think my chances are??
David.
I think I would be a naughty boy if I were you, and get dad to order a 2nd set top box, if he is on satellite, and not cable.
Then I'd arrange a dish be erected at your house ( antenna installer can do it if you can't), then move the extra decoder from his house to your house, connect to the dish, and go halves in the bill.
Problem solved...some good samaritans will come back here and tell you this is breaking terms and conditions...you figure what is really the best for you, but you would not be alone in doing that.
#31
Posted 28 May 2011 - 09:14 PM
Basil, on May 27 2011, 08:42 AM, said:
#32
Posted 28 May 2011 - 09:19 PM
digitalj, on May 27 2011, 04:38 PM, said:
#33
Posted 29 May 2011 - 11:47 AM
#34
Posted 29 May 2011 - 12:20 PM
Time will tell.
#35
Posted 29 May 2011 - 02:26 PM
DrP, on May 29 2011, 12:20 PM, said:
There is a reason why Foxtel choose Pace STB's and NDS because the parent compannies are all related. The products are customised to work together and I don't know of any pay tv operator using NDS and OpenTV with Thomson boxes. Thomson is mostly used with pay tv operators that favour Irdeto and Nagra. There may well be technical issues that prevent loading the OpenTV middleware that Foxtel uses on the Thomson boxes.
Does the regular MyStar even support H.264 and DVB-S2? Because Foxtel would want to move all sat customers over to H.264 and DVB-S2 capable STB's (like current IQ and IQHD models) to allow all SD channels to be changed over to H.264 and DVB-S2 to provide much more capacity. This will be made much easier after an acquisition since as we all know Austar was always the one dragging their feet. Foxtel will no longer have to wait until Austar bothers to swap out their prehistoric ADB etc decoders so we could see a roadmap for a change to universal H.264 SD and HD broadcasts within a few years (possibly even before analogue terrestrial FTA broadcasting is finished!). It would be amusing indeed if Foxtel managed to completely move to H.264 before terrestrial FTA even fully migrated to MPEG-2 digital.
#36
Posted 29 May 2011 - 04:53 PM
davmel, on May 29 2011, 02:26 PM, said:
Does the regular MyStar even support H.264 and DVB-S2? Because Foxtel would want to move all sat customers over to H.264 and DVB-S2 capable STB's (like current IQ and IQHD models) to allow all SD channels to be changed over to H.264 and DVB-S2 to provide much more capacity. This will be made much easier after an acquisition since as we all know Austar was always the one dragging their feet. Foxtel will no longer have to wait until Austar bothers to swap out their prehistoric ADB etc decoders so we could see a roadmap for a change to universal H.264 SD and HD broadcasts within a few years (possibly even before analogue terrestrial FTA broadcasting is finished!). It would be amusing indeed if Foxtel managed to completely move to H.264 before terrestrial FTA even fully migrated to MPEG-2 digital.
Mystar does not support DVB-S2 nor MPEG-4 AVC, but neither does Foxtel's original IQ and Foxtel has a shed load of its own non-PVR and original IQ boxes that it has to relieve itself of before it can convert the viewerbase to DVB-S2 and MPEG-4 AVC enmasse. Then there is the MyStar HD which can handle DVB-S2, MPEG-4 AVC and of course FTA terrestrial.
I have no doubt that Foxtel will move to a fully MPEG-4 AVC system before FTA does. It shouldn't be that surprising really. Pay TV, unlike FTA, doesn't have to keep MPEG-2 hanging around for 15 years because the little old lady down the road still has the receiver she bought in 1997.
#38
Posted 01 June 2011 - 06:07 AM
#39
Posted 01 June 2011 - 06:10 AM
#40
Posted 01 June 2011 - 10:53 AM
#41
Posted 01 June 2011 - 11:22 AM
Magnum72, on Jun 1 2011, 09:34 AM, said:
#42
Posted 01 June 2011 - 02:53 PM
davmel, on Jun 1 2011, 09:22 AM, said:
#43
Posted 01 June 2011 - 03:10 PM
Smacca, on Jun 1 2011, 02:53 PM, said:
Austar dropped their Darwin cable service a few years back after converting all sub sites to direct sat. The transmodulation from sat transponders to cable multiplexes was only necessary when the old B3 sat signals were too weak for direct home reception with small dishes. After C1 was launched there was no need for the Darwin cable network (although signal levels are useless in wet season storms).
But getting back to the point, Austar subs will NOT get commercial FTA channels via sat unless they are in the license areas of the metro broadcasters that are already on the sat. So some lucky Austar subscribers on the outer fringes of the capital cities will get sat access after Foxtel takes over, but for all others you'll have to use another device or a VAST receiver if eligible.
#45
Posted 01 June 2011 - 06:15 PM
#46
Posted 01 June 2011 - 06:48 PM
thunderball, on Jun 1 2011, 06:15 PM, said:
Hey AlanH...here's another example of the inequality of VAST and TERRESTRIAL. Why should this chap be able to receive both signals? Surely this must have severe impacts on those regional broadcasters in those areas?
Terrestrial broadcasts must be encrypted now, to ensure these signals are not falling into rouge antennas willy nilly around the area.
ps thunderball...sorry, this all has nothing to do with you, but is a point that has been debated before about the absurd differences in encryption on satellite, and not terrestrial. Nothing being shot at you from me..
#47
Posted 02 June 2011 - 04:54 AM
#48
Posted 02 June 2011 - 11:15 AM
I can bet if you don't want IQ you will be stuck with the current Austar box until you decide to upgrade.
#49
Posted 05 June 2011 - 01:07 PM
Magnum72, on Jun 5 2011, 12:05 PM, said:
Austar isn't limited to that part of the world.
Quote
Quote










