Hdtv Prices
#6501
Posted 04 January 2012 - 03:10 PM
Maybe someone should tell them that "fast screen refresh" does nothing for motion, flashing the same picture information on and off multiple times does not change it. Its the motion interpolation that can be used with a higher frame rate that can smooth motion but its an artificial effect not true to the source.
#6502
Posted 04 January 2012 - 06:07 PM
Owen, on Jan 4 2012, 04:10 PM, said:
http://www.harveynor...ogue-website-ad
http://www.harveynor...e-notice-3d-tvs
#6503
Posted 06 January 2012 - 11:39 AM
I was in JBHiFi talking to the manager about Panna TV's, he told me apparently no-one else can get hold of 65ST30's as HN has bought the stock up....was offer the 65VT30 for $4,200 from the ticketed $4,999 without even haggling or the guy having to check the Computer for pricing....if I was interested I recon $3750 was reachable....
For anyone wondering if we are paying over the top for TV's in Oz, I checked out the 65VT30 at Curry's in the U.K !!!!!!:
http://www.currys.co...388079-pdt.html - roughly $6,000 AUD - are you kidding me !!!!
I'm considering going back to the U.K later this year, but I'll probably buy a TV here and take it with me !!!!!
BB
Edited by BusterB, 06 January 2012 - 11:54 AM.
#6504
Posted 06 January 2012 - 11:52 AM
Edited by BusterB, 06 January 2012 - 11:53 AM.
#6505
Posted 06 January 2012 - 04:20 PM
BusterB, on Jan 6 2012, 09:39 AM, said:
I was in JBHiFi talking to the manager about Panna TV's, he told me apparently no-one else can get hold of 65ST30's as HN has bought the stock up....was offer the 65VT30 for $4,200 from the ticketed $4,999 without even haggling or the guy having to check the Computer for pricing....if I was interested I recon $3750 was reachable....
For anyone wondering if we are paying over the top for TV's in Oz, I checked out the 65VT30 at Curry's in the U.K !!!!!!:
http://www.currys.co...388079-pdt.html - roughly $6,000 AUD - are you kidding me !!!!
I'm considering going back to the U.K later this year, but I'll probably buy a TV here and take it with me !!!!!
BB
Amazon UK has it for a 1000 GBP less.
#6506
Posted 11 January 2012 - 09:28 AM
Is the wiki no longer being updated?
Is there another resource where you can see the best prices for a range of models all in the one place?
Cheers,
B
#6507
Posted 11 January 2012 - 10:02 AM
#6508
Posted 24 January 2012 - 07:40 PM
#6509
Posted 26 January 2012 - 10:04 AM
Anyone have one?
Looking for a 3rd TV that won't be used that much so don't need high end or larger size.
#6510
Posted 27 January 2012 - 07:11 PM
#6511
Posted 30 January 2012 - 08:28 AM
What price is worth considering for a quality product?
Which brand....only PANA and Samsung worth considering?
I'm asking from someone that bought a Pioneer 508A for Quality many years ago!
Edited by PLANT, 30 January 2012 - 08:29 AM.
#6512
Posted 30 January 2012 - 11:41 AM
PLANT, on 30 January 2012 - 08:28 AM, said:
What price is worth considering for a quality product?
Which brand....only PANA and Samsung worth considering?
I'm asking from someone that bought a Pioneer 508A for Quality many years ago!
Well the CNET reviews still have Samsung as the better colour reproduction over the Panna, so really it comes down to the environemtn in which the TV is going to be positioned, loads of sunlight or very dim room.
Personally, I went for a 58B550 Sammy two years ago because of two things, bang for buck but also where the TV is positioned meant that having a screen filter etc etc for reflections wasn't a necessity for me it was more a picture and colour reproduction. Plus the fact that I could access the service menu and unlock other features LOL.
I' have recently been looking to upgrade myself and looked at a 65VT30 & 64D8000 side by side in Myer - even the sales guy in Myer said he preferred the Sammy for colour repro rather than try and 'sell' the Panna to me....
Saying that though, I also looked at the Sharp 70inch puppy at Hardly Normal - IKEA Springavle, having messed about with the picture settings watching a bluray demo of National Treasure, it was a good picture considering it is an LCD !!!! - fantastci bang for buck.
So back to your question, for a 50 inch plasma at the moment, I'd go a Sammy 51 inch like this one: http://www.thegoodgu..._TV_PS51D550C1M
But finding one may be your problem.....
Regards
BB
#6513
Posted 30 January 2012 - 11:52 AM
BigBad64, on 26 January 2012 - 10:04 AM, said:
Anyone have one?
Looking for a 3rd TV that won't be used that much so don't need high end or larger size.
I've had the hisense 46" in my bedroom for 18 months without issue
#6514
Posted 30 January 2012 - 01:07 PM
com5984, on 30 January 2012 - 11:52 AM, said:
Thanks.
Decided I didn't need full HD and size wise a 32" was right for the location/use.
Just wasn't game to buy a "no-name" brand so just bought a Panasonic TH-L32X30A at JB Hi Fi for $470.
#6515
Posted 30 January 2012 - 02:06 PM
I was in a same path looking at the 2 TVs. In my view, unless you only use it for blu-ray source, the Samsung should be avoided even though I wanted to like it for the price. It might have the most accurate color but the motion blur is simply not acceptable. I watched it side by side with pana plasma, samsung LED and other brand LED/LCD. All of them are smoother than the Samsung which is pathetic. I was not even watching something moving very fast. Just some moving credit at the end of a demo...
Edited by informer, 30 January 2012 - 02:07 PM.
#6516
Posted 30 January 2012 - 03:51 PM
To my knowledge, motion smoothing/frame interpolation is ON in shop mode for the Pannys, but not turned on with the Sammys. I found myself in the exact same position noting the difference of scrolling end credits between a 50ST30A and a 51D8000 - it was very very noticable.
Mind you, at home I would immediately ensure that and frame fudging is turned OFF on any set. Hate that crazy lookin ****....
#6517
Posted 30 January 2012 - 04:12 PM
I understand what you are coming from. Some person believe the judder cancellation is a fake effect. But I, like most people, find it hard to enjoy judder movements. They don't look good in any way and make me dizzy after a while.
In theory, motion handling and black level are the 2 major advantages for Plasma. This is clearly not the case for Samsung plasma vs Samsung LED (D8000). If you have to go for a plasma, stick with Pannys.
Edited by informer, 30 January 2012 - 04:13 PM.
#6518
Posted 30 January 2012 - 09:31 PM
Plasmas do a good job of displaying video sources the way they are just like CRT did without artificial enhancements, film looks like film with its inherent occasional jitter and video is smooth as it should be.
Motion interpolation can be used but only with film source for those who like the look, its not appropriate to use motion interpolation with true interlaced video sources like sport and the TV should disable it automatically.
Blueray players are often in 60Hz output mode by default, this results in terrible judder with film source on a display without motion interpolation enabled, this is what I reckon you saw on the Samsung plasma.
If the player was set to 24Hz for film it should look good and accurate to the source.
Last time I directly compared the ST and GT Panasonic's to the D8000 Sammy Plasma I saw no difference in motion but both Panasonic's suffered very obviously from compression artefacts on free to air TV where the Samsung looked fine. The difference was stark not subtle and I could not live with the Panasonic picture.
#6519
Posted 30 January 2012 - 10:38 PM
Free to air TV hopefully as you said should be OK but again I need to find a place with TV show for demo. After this motion blur shock, I find it hard to trust anything on review or theory but my own eyes.
Edited by informer, 31 January 2012 - 08:23 AM.
#6520
Posted 31 January 2012 - 10:18 AM
I've had my Sammy for two years watching all kinds of source material and to be honest can't say I've noticed 'judder' at all.....
Ultimately it all comes down to personal preference, I prefer Sammy's to Panna's as I feel they give a better quality picture, after all how many movies do we honestly watch that have plenty of very dark scenes and therefore require a TV with rich ink blacks.....The Dark Knight (bluray) was awesome on my Sammy.
Regards
BB
#6521
Posted 01 February 2012 - 06:59 AM
informer, on 30 January 2012 - 10:38 PM, said:
Free to air TV hopefully as you said should be OK but again I need to find a place with TV show for demo. After this motion blur shock, I find it hard to trust anything on review or theory but my own eyes.
Component does not support 24Hz so the TV's where receiving 60Hz, and since the Sammy does not use motion interpolation by default little wonder it showed judder, it should.
Motion interpolation is a fix for a problem that should not be an issue, when film source is displayed properly it looks fine without being processed.
Cinema film cameras use low shutter speeds so any significant motion is very blurred, pause playback of a Bluray during a panning shot and you will see its more blurred than VHS tape.
Motion interpolation systems attempt to fix low frame rate jitter and 3:2 judder, they can also attempt to sharpen the image during motion, however in both cases they are trying to create information that does not exist in the source.
It should also be noted that the Samsung uses noise reduction by default, this is very effective with free to air TV but will increase motion blur.
As is often the case there is more going on behind the scenes than most people realise and without an understanding of what affects what its easy to come to the wrong conclusions.
#6522
Posted 01 February 2012 - 06:23 PM
#6523
Posted 01 February 2012 - 08:46 PM
#6525
Posted 06 February 2012 - 03:46 PM
Hardly Normal Clearance Dandenong had an LG 65inch LCD ticketed at $3,488
64D8000 seems to have stopped at $2,900 in JBHiFi, hasn't come down for weeks.










