Wonder if this is going to happen at the same time as the other commercials
Dtv For The Rest Of The N W Coast
#76
Posted 26 February 2008 - 04:05 AM
Wonder if this is going to happen at the same time as the other commercials
#77
Posted 27 February 2008 - 04:22 PM
We haven't been forgotten!!!
I suppose stone age progress is better than no progress at all!
#79
Posted 02 March 2008 - 05:49 PM
Edited by M'bozo, 02 March 2008 - 05:50 PM.
#80
Posted 02 March 2008 - 06:16 PM
Makes you wonder what gives?????
#82
Posted 03 March 2008 - 08:52 PM
#83
Posted 04 March 2008 - 09:57 PM
#84
Posted 05 March 2008 - 06:10 AM
#85
Posted 05 March 2008 - 11:56 AM
#86
Posted 06 March 2008 - 05:04 PM
#87
Posted 06 March 2008 - 05:19 PM
marcj, on Nov 19 2006, 09:56 AM, said:
Interesting.
I'm assuming it's not really a SFN, just frequency re-use.
Ended up getting Mt Barrow digital to solve.
That comment originally referred to ABC/SBS.
Happened again today all stations (different house). Not nice, ran out of time trying to fix. Unfortunately Mt Barrow signals not up to scratch either. Will see what I can pull out of the hat next week.
And I'm assured it's a SFN but this would be well out of the coverage area so I guess it becomes co-channel interference.
Edited by M'bozo, 06 March 2008 - 05:22 PM.
#89
Posted 09 March 2008 - 05:55 PM
#91
Posted 12 March 2008 - 05:18 PM
BigBadBaz, on Mar 9 2008, 06:55 PM, said:
That wasn't apparent from measurements I was making last Friday, Saturday & today.
All channels were about equal from my perspective.
#92
Posted 13 March 2008 - 12:56 PM
#93
Posted 13 March 2008 - 08:22 PM
M, on Mar 12 2008, 06:18 PM, said:
All channels were about equal from my perspective.
Ok, haven't had the promax out to do real measurements yet, but have 2 set top box's on one antenna, these both show about 75-85% signal for all other stations but 55-60% for WIN (sometimes drops to 30-40% causing drop outs) Also have a usb tv stick on separate (external) antenna, the software shows full signal on all other stations but about 75% for WIN. I realise this is not the most accurate way to measure, but it is a pretty fair comparison. BTW I am high on hill in West Ulverstone with line of sight to Heazlewoods Hill and get signal from Mount Barrow which is as good as signal from ULV even with antenna pointed at ULV, all levels same from Barrow. (including WIN) Go figure
Even with this lower level, WIN performing well ATM, no drops.
#94
Posted 14 March 2008 - 06:12 AM
BigBadBaz, on Mar 13 2008, 09:22 PM, said:
3 of my measurements were at River Rd, Alice St and South Rd West Ulverstone, so I can't figure your readings. But then at your place, it could be different.
The cBERs should be better from Heazlewoods Hill than Mt Barrow. Perhaps your promax will show this if you fire it up.
However, if the signal is high enough in level, I still go for Mt Barrow as the potential reliabillity of the transmissions is better than local.
(I wonder if there will be any announcement in the local paper about digital starting up? I notice there was a letter yesterday in the Advocate about problems with digital reception in Burnie
Edited by M'bozo, 14 March 2008 - 06:20 AM.
#95
Posted 14 March 2008 - 07:59 AM
Doesn't matter if nobody can do this as I will be up next month, but thanks to anyone who can!
Dave
#96
Posted 14 March 2008 - 08:19 AM
Sent an email to you.
Marc.
Edited by M'bozo, 14 March 2008 - 08:58 AM.
#97
Posted 15 March 2008 - 10:47 PM
#98
Posted 15 March 2008 - 11:00 PM
d_n_care, on Mar 15 2008, 11:47 PM, said:
Don't know, possibly some time this year.
If you are up high enough, have the right antenna, oriented correctly, etc etc you might get reception from Mt Barrow.
If unsure, contact one of the local operators from eg Yellow Pages for further advice.
#99
Posted 17 March 2008 - 02:46 PM
I've been receiving TDT, Southern Cross, ABC and SBS from Mt Barrow for the past 2 months, and only in the past few days has Win been coming through clearly. Could this possibly be due to Ulverstone coming online? Also, if I reposition my antenna, is the Ulverstone signal stong enough to make it 30km to Burnie?
Cause surely if Mt Barrow can send its signal over 200km, surely we can pick up Ulverstones signal in Burnie!
And TDT has been having some pixelation problems lately. Are they screwing around with the signal from Mt Barrow or would this be signal interference being caused by the now online Ulverstone Transmitter.
Thanks
#100
Posted 17 March 2008 - 04:31 PM
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Marc.
Edited by M'bozo, 17 March 2008 - 04:31 PM.










