IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> LOST: Seven 576p vs. Seven SD vs. ABC (US) HD, Who will win? ;)
anthonysimilion
post May 12 2006, 12:04 AM
Post #1


DTV Forums Member
Group Icon

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 3,587
Joined: 6-October 03
From: Perth
Member No.: 1,076



I've tried to get the frames matched up as closely as possible:

Frame 1
Seven SD
Seven 576p
ABC (US) HD

Frame 2
Seven SD
Seven 576p
ABC (US) HD

Frame 3
Seven SD
Seven 576p
ABC (US) HD

Frame 4
Seven SD
Seven 576p
ABC (US) HD

Frame 5
Seven SD
Seven 576p
ABC (US) HD

Frame 6
Seven SD
Seven 576p
ABC (US) HD

Comments? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Champion_R
post May 12 2006, 12:27 AM
Post #2


DTV Forums Member
Group Icon

Group: Member
Posts: 2,249
Joined: 12-October 03
From: Perth
Member No.: 1,182



Definately a lot more finer detail in the ABC 720p versions but some motion shots would really help the ABC shine.

1080i > 720p
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
anthonysimilion
post May 12 2006, 12:40 AM
Post #3


DTV Forums Member
Group Icon

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 3,587
Joined: 6-October 03
From: Perth
Member No.: 1,076



Whoa! Steady there - I'd prefer if we didn't get into the 1080i vs. 720p debate here (IMG:style_emoticons/default/happy.gif) - let's try and stick to the topic at hand, which is comparing ABC, Seven 576p and Seven SD.

As I've mentioned before, the 576p does provide a very small amount of additional detail over SD, but the artefacting is significant.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pneu
post May 12 2006, 02:17 AM
Post #4


DTV Forums Member
Group Icon

Group: Member
Posts: 2,055
Joined: 15-September 04
Member No.: 5,707



Interesting comparisons, Anthony.

Isn't it strange how SD always manages to look softer and less detailed despite being the same res as the ED version. Even though the ED version has come directly from the HD source, the SD has still come from the same HD source down to the same resolution, so in theory it should look identical to ED, but it doesn't.

I often notice SD looks a lot better when it comes from a HD source. A film to HD to SD version almost always looks better than film to SD, yet there's no logical reason for it. Must be the mastering equipment or something?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sold
post May 13 2006, 07:04 PM
Post #5


DTV Forums Member
Group Icon

Group: Member
Posts: 847
Joined: 11-May 05
From: Adelaide
Member No.: 10,373



QUOTE (anthonysimilion @ May 11 2006, 11:34 PM) *


Well the ABC version is twice as good as either of the 7 versions but that's no real suprise.

What I did find interesting though was the difference between the 7 SD and ED versions. What I thought:

Frame 1:
The ED version is noticeably better with more detail

Frame 2:
The SD version is better with more detail. Are you sure that you didn't get these two mixed up, as it's the only one out of place for me with regards to the amount of detail?

Frame 3:
The ED version definitely has more detail but the amount of artifacting is very bad especially across her mouth and forehead.

Frame 4:
Same comments as frame 3.

Frame 5:
The ED version is much better here. Mountains more detail in the grass areas and no artifacts on the back of their shirts.

Frame 6:
This one is a bit of a toss up. Not a whole lot of difference between the two IMO. Probably give it to the ED version due to less artifacts on his neck.

What hardware/software/decoder settings did you use for the viewing, capturing and resizing?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
anthonysimilion
post May 13 2006, 07:25 PM
Post #6


DTV Forums Member
Group Icon

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 3,587
Joined: 6-October 03
From: Perth
Member No.: 1,076



Just a standard weave deinterlace using the Media Player Classic built in MPEG-2 decoder. Captured directly from the DirectShow output by Fraps, and resized using Photoshop. Saved at 80% JPEG quality - difference by eye between uncompressed and 80% was practically zero.

Seven's 576p does provide a small amount of additional detail, but the artefacting just ruins the overall video.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DavoNogo
post May 14 2006, 03:40 AM
Post #7


DTV Forums Member
Group Icon

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 5,801
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Sydney
Member No.: 6,952



I did a similar comparison between PRiME 576p, Seven SD and ABC HD (divx) a few months ago... if you're interested, I could upload them too... there's a lot less artifacting on PRiME, though it's still not perfect.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
anthonysimilion
post May 14 2006, 01:00 PM
Post #8


DTV Forums Member
Group Icon

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 3,587
Joined: 6-October 03
From: Perth
Member No.: 1,076



Sure. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Just in case anyone is wondering, these ABC HD shots aren't from a recompressed 'DiVX/XViD' video.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sgt Bargearse
post May 24 2006, 01:15 AM
Post #9


DTV Forums Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 74
Joined: 26-February 06
From: Perth
Member No.: 17,515



The 576p definitely looks softer and more washed out than the 576i.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mike Muzz
post May 26 2006, 10:24 PM
Post #10


DTV Forums Member
*

Group: Member
Posts: 14
Joined: 20-May 06
Member No.: 19,957



Just wondering how you got the ABC HD versions?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mchuelio
post May 29 2006, 04:04 PM
Post #11


DTV Forums Member
Group Icon

Group: Member
Posts: 421
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Melbourne
Member No.: 11,528



QUOTE (Mike Muzz @ May 26 2006, 10:24 PM) *
Just wondering how you got the ABC HD versions?



Downloaded Via bit torrent, thats what I do, love the seasons 2 Finale!

The "Others" or are they!

Hmmmmmm!


Keeep Trucking :ph34r:

Mc.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dkmaj
post May 29 2006, 04:41 PM
Post #12


DTV Forums Member
Group Icon

Group: Member
Posts: 561
Joined: 8-September 03
From: FNQ
Member No.: 703



QUOTE
Downloaded Via bit torrent, thats what I do, love the seasons 2 Finale!

The "Others" or are they!


hurley "did that bird just say my name!!...." (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mchuelio
post May 29 2006, 04:59 PM
Post #13


DTV Forums Member
Group Icon

Group: Member
Posts: 421
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Melbourne
Member No.: 11,528



QUOTE (dkmaj @ May 29 2006, 04:41 PM) *
hurley "did that bird just say my name!!...." (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

:ph34r: (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cool.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)


I want more lost NOW!


Mc :ph34r:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mike Muzz
post Jun 3 2006, 02:21 PM
Post #14


DTV Forums Member
*

Group: Member
Posts: 14
Joined: 20-May 06
Member No.: 19,957



QUOTE (mchuelio @ May 29 2006, 04:04 PM) *
Downloaded Via bit torrent, thats what I do, love the seasons 2 Finale!


I've BT'ed the whole season, but the resolution on the files is something like 300 x 600 not even close to HD
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lawyer1990
post Jun 3 2006, 02:52 PM
Post #15


DTV Forums Member
Group Icon

Group: Member
Posts: 375
Joined: 5-February 05
From: Sydney
Member No.: 8,270



QUOTE (Mike Muzz @ Jun 3 2006, 02:21 PM) *
I've BT'ed the whole season, but the resolution on the files is something like 300 x 600 not even close to HD


If you check your files would be 624x352 at about 350mb each. The 720p HD versions are 1.36gb which are 1280x720p and the HR-HDTV versions are 700mb at 960x544.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
anthonysimilion
post Jun 3 2006, 05:34 PM
Post #16


DTV Forums Member
Group Icon

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 3,587
Joined: 6-October 03
From: Perth
Member No.: 1,076



The ABC HD captures here are sourced from actual OTA broadcast, at 13.15Mbps.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Champion_R
post Jun 3 2006, 05:54 PM
Post #17


DTV Forums Member
Group Icon

Group: Member
Posts: 2,249
Joined: 12-October 03
From: Perth
Member No.: 1,182



QUOTE (anthonysimilion @ Jun 3 2006, 03:34 PM) *
The ABC HD captures here are sourced from actual OTA broadcast, at 13.15Mbps.

That's pretty crap for US HDTV.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
anthonysimilion
post Jun 3 2006, 06:54 PM
Post #18


DTV Forums Member
Group Icon

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 3,587
Joined: 6-October 03
From: Perth
Member No.: 1,076



Yes, it's quite low for OTA.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mike Muzz
post Jun 5 2006, 04:24 PM
Post #19


DTV Forums Member
*

Group: Member
Posts: 14
Joined: 20-May 06
Member No.: 19,957



QUOTE (lawyer1990 @ Jun 3 2006, 02:52 PM) *
If you check your files would be 624x352 at about 350mb each. The 720p HD versions are 1.36gb which are 1280x720p and the HR-HDTV versions are 700mb at 960x544.


I've never seen anything but the the 350mb files. maybe we should talk about where you the HD and HRHD ones (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sleep.gif) ?
Although its all over now, starting Season 3 this will be the way to go.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
LBM
post Jun 5 2006, 04:57 PM
Post #20


DTV Forums Member
Group Icon

Group: Member
Posts: 1,706
Joined: 19-August 03
Member No.: 168



The shots here show a decent comparison for static images but in motion would be better. Any chance of a short video showing each segment (or one) for comparison?

BTW, regarding the sizes of video sourced from unknown places, the versions with 5.1 sound are much better to look at. Out of interest, I stumbled across a source to get a couple of images to show the difference.

Low Quality - From Lost Season 2 Episode 17
Medium Quality - From 24 Season 5 Episode 1

The shot from 24 is from the first five minutes and Lost shouldn't have any spoilers either... They are a similar expression and only include a head shot.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post


2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 31st July 2010 - 03:27 AM