Basic Audio Calibration
#626
Posted 08 September 2011 - 09:07 AM
I upgraded a little while ago to a Denon 3310 & XPA-5 combo. Sounds great. However running Audyssey, all my speaker trims are around -10 to -15, including sub. If it were a sub volume issue, then I would expect the sub volume to be negative and the speaker trims postiive, to try and correct for the volume mismatch. Before this configuration I had a Denon 1909, which runs the same level of audyssey, which calibrated trims all to within +3 - -3 dB, which would seem about right.
Its got the distances pretty much spot on. Its a small room maybe 3x4m, with large speakers, so im wondering if this is driving all trims down, however as I indicated, this wasnt the case for the 1909.
Another note. I added a surround back speaker to the configuration, as I had it spare. I configured the Denon to recognise it, and it calibrated similarly to the others. I did find that I had to put in different movies with different audios (one for DTS, one for Dolby and one for PCM), then go into the sound paramaters menu and turn Surround back from Off, to matrix or Pl IIx. PITA.
#627
Posted 09 September 2011 - 09:39 AM
davep, on Sep 8 2011, 09:07 AM, said:
I upgraded a little while ago to a Denon 3310 & XPA-5 combo. Sounds great. However running Audyssey, all my speaker trims are around -10 to -15, including sub. If it were a sub volume issue, then I would expect the sub volume to be negative and the speaker trims postiive, to try and correct for the volume mismatch. Before this configuration I had a Denon 1909, which runs the same level of audyssey, which calibrated trims all to within +3 - -3 dB, which would seem about right.
It does not matter where the trims end up. They give you at least +/-10dB range to ensure you can actually achieve the correct SPL. I would be a little concerned that the levels are so low compared to your last figures, so would suggest checking the levels with an SPL meter.
Quote
It could be, so another reason for the SLP meter.
Quote
Ever since getting "extended surround" back in 03, I've always forced the back surrounds to be ON. I do this simply because not all EX/ES soundtracks are flagged and so don't want to miss out on hearing a sound track the way it was intentionally mixed.
#628
Posted 09 September 2011 - 10:00 AM
I have a cheap DSE SPL that I used to calibrate my old Yamaha avr trims, so I'll recheck values. It might be a dodgy audyssey microphone, which would also lead to potential issues of equalizer errors. It might be worthwhile seeing if I can borrow a forum-members mic for comparison.
The whole having to turn on the rear surround was overly complicated and menu's should be a lot more straight forward, rather than having to insert a disk with each audio type and then manually turning the rear on. I would like to have seen more of a simplistic flow chart, like "do you want to matrix 6.1 for 5.1 tracks? yes/no", "do you want to apply this for all audio codecs? yes/no"
I will have to do a bit more reading, as the Denon gives two options for mixing types for a rear surround, and im not sure which one is best.
#629
Posted 10 September 2011 - 04:22 PM
#630
Posted 21 October 2011 - 10:23 AM
I need some clarification and help with the Bass management. I have Yamaha Z7 which I am using as a pre-amp. Under bass, there is an option "Phase" which goes to Normal and Recerse. Can you explain what changes they will make for my sub.
I find that my bass is not very firm and sounds more like a rattle.
ALso I am not sure how to set and DRC. I have the options for Max/ Standard/ Min-Auto. I understand that under MAx the dialog is emphasized but the Bass is pushed down..is this the case?
Thanks for your help.
Ilian
#631
Posted 21 October 2011 - 11:02 AM
Ilian, on Oct 21 2011, 11:23 AM, said:
I need some clarification and help with the Bass management. I have Yamaha Z7 which I am using as a pre-amp. Under bass, there is an option "Phase" which goes to Normal and Recerse. Can you explain what changes they will make for my sub.
How we use to use it was to play an 80Hz(if using an 80Hz crossover) test tone and while watching an SPL meter flip the phase. The setting that gave the highest reading is the correct one. Or you could use full range pink noise and an RTA or FFT analyzer and watch the crossover region while flipping phase, whichever gives the highest reading is the correct one.
But as I said we generally don't use it anymore as when delay is correct, phase is also correct. You can use the above methods to adjust sub time delay in a pinch though there are other more complex methods to fine tune this.
Quote
Quote
The Auto setting checks the metadata of the track that is playing and will follow it's direction, currently this is a TrueHD only feature and has been a bane for consumers as some processors reset this to Auto on power cycle etc. Don't use the Auto setting, make the setting manually depending on your needs.
Cheers
#632
Posted 21 October 2011 - 04:51 PM
#633
Posted 24 October 2011 - 08:20 AM
Thanks to you and everyone who has contributed to the thread so far. I'm not quite sure how I hadn't come across it before now, but am glad I finally have
Up until now I had been content with the auto setup of my Z7, but after reading this thread thought I'd check things out with a SPL.
The LCR and surrounds were all pretty close, but the sub was nowhere near it. The speakers were all either -0.5 or -1dB, but to get the sub up to 75-79dB I had to increase the trim to +8! The gain on the sub is probably between 2/3 and 3/4
Would people recommend turning up the gain further and reducing the trims? Or could the polarity of the sub be wrong?
I have played my demo material at this new setting and it sounds fantastic!! I had previously thought it sounded pretty good but in the back of my mind thought there should be a little more punch. I wasn't expecting it to be so much lower than what it turned out to be when I was watching the SPL meter.
Cheers
Simon
Edited by raZorTT, 24 October 2011 - 08:20 AM.
#634
Posted 27 October 2011 - 12:29 PM
Ilian, on Oct 21 2011, 10:23 AM, said:
I need some clarification and help with the Bass management. I have Yamaha Z7 which I am using as a pre-amp. Under bass, there is an option "Phase" which goes to Normal and Recerse. Can you explain what changes they will make for my sub.
I find that my bass is not very firm and sounds more like a rattle.
ALso I am not sure how to set and DRC. I have the options for Max/ Standard/ Min-Auto. I understand that under MAx the dialog is emphasized but the Bass is pushed down..is this the case?
Thanks for your help.
Ilian
If your decoder offers phase option for normal or reverse, I would use normal. If you do need to reverse the sub's phase, you would do so on the back of the SUB. The reason for normal in the AVR is that signals are all in phase when decoded, so you don't want to be messing that up. If you need to reverse the polarity of the aub
raZorTT, on Oct 24 2011, 08:20 AM, said:
Thanks to you and everyone who has contributed to the thread so far. I'm not quite sure how I hadn't come across it before now, but am glad I finally have
Up until now I had been content with the auto setup of my Z7, but after reading this thread thought I'd check things out with a SPL.
The LCR and surrounds were all pretty close, but the sub was nowhere near it. The speakers were all either -0.5 or -1dB, but to get the sub up to 75-79dB I had to increase the trim to +8! The gain on the sub is probably between 2/3 and 3/4
Would people recommend turning up the gain further and reducing the trims? Or could the polarity of the sub be wrong?
I have played my demo material at this new setting and it sounds fantastic!! I had previously thought it sounded pretty good but in the back of my mind thought there should be a little more punch. I wasn't expecting it to be so much lower than what it turned out to be when I was watching the SPL meter.
Cheers
Simon
The key point to the +75dB level is to be able to set your max playback level. So the tones are -30dBFS or 30dB below 105dB per channel. The trims are designed to move +/-10dB so that you can get all channels to playback at the desired level of +75dB. Whilst I would prefer all the trims to be below 0 and into the negative, they have don't have to be. So long as you actually have enough range and are compromising the level you should be fine.
SUBs pose a few challenges because they have the trim of the AVR as well as the trim on their plate amp.
In my case, my AVR SW trim is +3 and the plate amp is 9 o'clock (range from 7~5). There was a time when I was running the AVR trim at -10dB and turning the plate amp up to 11 or 12o'clock. I just found that I get cleaner bass now with the AVR trim higher than the SW trim.
This will be different for various equipment, so some experimentation may be in order here.
#635
Posted 27 October 2011 - 12:39 PM
MarkTecher, on Oct 27 2011, 01:29 PM, said:
The key point to the +75dB level is to be able to set your max playback level. So the tones are -30dBFS or 30dB below 105dB per channel. The trims are designed to move +/-10dB so that you can get all channels to playback at the desired level of +75dB. Whilst I would prefer all the trims to be below 0 and into the negative, they have don't have to be. So long as you actually have enough range and are compromising the level you should be fine.
SUBs pose a few challenges because they have the trim of the AVR as well as the trim on their plate amp.
In my case, my AVR SW trim is +3 and the plate amp is 9 o'clock (range from 7~5). There was a time when I was running the AVR trim at -10dB and turning the plate amp up to 11 or 12o'clock. I just found that I get cleaner bass now with the AVR trim higher than the SW trim.
This will be different for various equipment, so some experimentation may be in order here.
Thanks Mark,
I was just worried that having it up around +8 or +10 might introduce clipping or similar. So far it's been sounding great!.
I'll do some experimenting and report back if I find anything of interest.
Cheers,
Simon
#636
Posted 27 October 2011 - 08:21 PM
raZorTT, on Oct 27 2011, 12:39 PM, said:
I was just worried that having it up around +8 or +10 might introduce clipping or similar. So far it's been sounding great!.
I'll do some experimenting and report back if I find anything of interest.
Cheers,
Simon
#637
Posted 08 December 2011 - 07:50 PM
#638
Posted 09 December 2011 - 12:27 PM
SDL, on Dec 8 2011, 07:50 PM, said:
#639
Posted 04 January 2012 - 02:22 PM
#640
Posted 08 January 2012 - 10:23 AM
TheBluDude, on 04 January 2012 - 02:22 PM, said:
1. The test tomes are -20dBFS, not -30dBFS as they should be so if you have calibrated to +75dB/C/Slow as this thread recommends, you are 10dB too low. To achieve propper 105dB, you need to be meauring at 85dB which is LOUD.
2. The test tones are 6.1 and not 7.1 so there is no independant adjustments for back surrounds.
Like THX CALIBTRATOR, the WOW disc is good, but I would only recommend usinng the disc as a test disc, not for actual calibration of the audio.
#641
Posted 06 June 2012 - 04:45 PM
does anyone know if there is a test tone generator on a denon 3312 instead of running the audessy setup?
#643
Posted 10 June 2012 - 03:32 PM
#644
Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:50 AM










