So anyone tried SC10 from Tuggers Hill yet?
#1
Posted 05 January 2004 - 11:58 AM
#2
Posted 05 January 2004 - 02:54 PM
#3
Posted 05 January 2004 - 03:12 PM
gadget
#4
Posted 05 January 2004 - 03:42 PM
gadget, on Jan 5 2004, 03:12 PM, said:
gadget
#5
Posted 05 January 2004 - 08:46 PM
Here's hoping
gadget
#6
Posted 05 January 2004 - 08:57 PM
#7
Posted 05 January 2004 - 09:06 PM
Quote
Are you sure, I've tried a few times at work today and couldn't get anything, just tried again at home and still nothing. Ch62 767.5Mhz is that what your STB is telling you?
gadget
#8
Posted 05 January 2004 - 09:11 PM
gadget, on Jan 5 2004, 09:06 PM, said:
Quote
Are you sure, I've tried a few times at work today and couldn't get anything, just tried again at home and still nothing. Ch62 767.5Mhz is that what your STB is telling you?
gadget
Don't have a STB, only a DTV card.
Freq : 767500
Bandwidth : 7
VPID : 353
APID : 354
#9
Posted 05 January 2004 - 09:17 PM
See you Wednesday
gadget
#10
Posted 05 January 2004 - 10:06 PM
I have a VisionPlus DTV Card and I managed to scan in SC10 (frequency: 767.5MHz) like essess. On my Dad's Teac DVB300, we couldn't scan it in at all (tried automatic and manual scanning).
It's quite possible that SC10 has stuffed up a value on their transmitter setup or similar.
BTW. Signal strength is 61% and Quality is 98% using an old UHF outdoor antenna in my bedroom.
#11
Posted 06 January 2004 - 08:39 AM
#12
Posted 06 January 2004 - 12:49 PM
Just back from doing installs, SC Ten is not quite right from Tugg Hill. The only STB to receive it so far has been the Strong 5300. My field strength meter won't give any readings except signal strength. I hope to talk to Ten today.
gadget
#13
Posted 06 January 2004 - 05:34 PM
So far Ikusi, Humax & Teac STB's won't receive SC Ten from Tugg Hill, Strong 5300 will.
gadget
#14
Posted 06 January 2004 - 09:23 PM
#15
Posted 06 January 2004 - 09:29 PM
Quote
#16
Posted 06 January 2004 - 09:39 PM
#17
Posted 06 January 2004 - 09:57 PM
Quote
I agree, but I don't think the problem is with the STB's, SC Ten use the same V-pid & A-pid on ch 6 (main transmitter) & ch 62 (translator), as do all the other stations. Yet only one model STB (to date) has been able to pick up ch 62. Further my test equipment is unable to get all readings for ch 62, again no other problems with any other ch's. This is a new ch that has just been switched on (Monday 5th Jan), I might add that these tests have been carried out at 5 different locations, with the same results. Strange? you bet. Watch this space for more info.
gadget
Ps.
I don't think your a smartalec, all points of view are welcome and read with great interest.
#18
Posted 07 January 2004 - 08:31 AM
I am happy to report SC Ten is up and running from Tugg Hill. I received a phone call from Ten's engineering this morning and checked all my STB's at work and they all receive the signal.
Oh happy days
gadget
#19
Posted 07 January 2004 - 08:40 AM
About Bloody time.. That's all i can say...I'll believe it when i see it when i get home and do a rescan.. But anything is possable..
Thanks for the Help Gadget..
#20
Posted 07 January 2004 - 03:07 PM
#21
Posted 07 January 2004 - 08:14 PM
Finally!!!
All stations working perfectly on my Aver... now if only I could enlarge the 4:3 tranmission?
Something else I've noticed: on ABC's digital tranmission there is a thin white line of "garbled" stuff up the top left of the picture. Anyone else get that?
#22
Posted 07 January 2004 - 08:38 PM
Quote
Search WSS, lots has been said on this subject.
gadget
#23
Posted 07 January 2004 - 08:58 PM
#24
Posted 07 January 2004 - 09:29 PM
The time has come to buy a 16:9 display.
PS, I know a chap in Canberra that has some cheap 70 & 76cm WS TVs.
#25
Posted 07 January 2004 - 09:35 PM
I read Rainmaker's question, was just about to reply when the grand daughter started crying, in the time it took to stick the dummy in and stop the crying you answered the question.
So Rainmaker my reply is this;
Quote
The time has come to buy a 16:9 display.
PS, I know a chap in Canberra that has some cheap.
You won't see them on a widescreen TV, hence the comment from George.
gadget










