Get The Best Reception, Perth & Toodyay
#26
Posted 24 January 2007 - 09:34 PM
Whilst it is possible to be the cell phone tower it is much more likely to be the water police transmitter.
When you have posted 10 times I will be able to message you with more details
AlanH
#27
Posted 25 January 2007 - 07:02 AM
How about analogue reception or is this wot u r reporting?
Your existing antenna has Band 1 elements (the big ones) for reception of analogue Channel 2. These elements may be exacerbating VHF interference and signal overload.
Best solution is to move 100% digital and replace the old monster with a good Band 3/4+ digital combo (f-type connections) and all quad sheild feeds. This antenna will most likely eliminate Ch 2 analogue, but the remainder of the analogue transmissions will be just fine.
You may gain some intermediate improvement by reducing the signal level into the decoder (I'm assuming your current levels are all very strong).
If there is an amplifier (masthead etc) in circuit, try removing it.
#28
Posted 25 January 2007 - 07:45 PM
Those techniques may not be enough because the main signals can be quite weak in that area. I suspect the two way radio transmitter will be quite strong.
This is why I did not do my usual link.
AlanH
#29
Posted 25 January 2007 - 08:15 PM
I am yet to ask around the neighbours to see if they have trouble as well. They, and I work nights.
We are renting so replacing antennas is not really an option and am also loathe to do it because i do get great reception at times.
The plot thickens.....
#30
Posted 26 January 2007 - 08:36 AM
Strahan, on Jan 25 2007, 09:15 PM, said:
Oh and antenna corrosion is the other possible offender.
I agree Alan, but it's no harm trying to eliminate the simple things first.
#31
Posted 26 January 2007 - 12:45 PM
Which type of interference is it on analog TV? Better Television and Radio Reception
Are you in a block of units or a single dwelling. If it is a single dwelling does it have a metal roof?
Are you currently using an indoor antenna or a socket in the wall?
Indoor Antennas
#32
Posted 27 January 2007 - 12:43 PM
There is also a sat dish for foxtel etc on the roof (tile roof) which also runs down to wall plug. We dont have foxtel.
The analogue interferance looks like its FM broadcast. From the examples on the ABC website.
Its the same interferance I think because it too is random. Perfect one minute then not a thing.
Thanks for all your help, we might get to the bottom of it eventually.
#33
Posted 27 January 2007 - 07:57 PM
Strahan, on Jan 27 2007, 01:43 PM, said:
Strahan, on Jan 27 2007, 01:43 PM, said:
#34
Posted 28 January 2007 - 08:47 AM
There is 2 community radio stations in View St East Fremantle. 107.9 6CCR and 91.3 6PCR. Neither of these stations are very powerful. This FM interference would be almost continuous. The weather can affect the level of interference by the TV signals varying is strength. If 2 way radio such as the the water police was a problem then it would appear in bursts.
I suggest your antenna system is faulty and it is up to the landlord to fix it.
AlanH
#35
Posted 28 January 2007 - 06:17 PM
#36
Posted 30 January 2007 - 02:31 PM
I have by-passed the DW30 and unplugged the power unit with no loss of picture at all.
Will wait and see tonight if I lose channel 9 and 10.
#37
Posted 31 January 2007 - 09:15 AM
None of the other antenna outlets in other rooms work but I can live with that.
Thanks for all the help.
#38
Posted 31 January 2007 - 11:45 AM
You may even get by with a 3 way splitter instead of the DW30
#39
Posted 31 January 2007 - 12:29 PM
I guess it something to do with either the DW30 picking up signals or the power supply feeding it up the co-ax?
#40
Posted 31 January 2007 - 01:00 PM
Try a splitter without the amp.
#41
Posted 31 January 2007 - 09:20 PM
In that location it is extremely unlikely that there will be an overload of TV signals, however local FM transmitters are a different story.
Also Distribution amplifiers have much less gain than masthead amplifiers so are much less likely to overload anyway.
If you use a passive splitter, it is highly likely there would be insufficient TV signal. After all why was the amplifier put there in the first place.
AlanH
#42
Posted 31 January 2007 - 10:06 PM
wahroonga farm, on Jan 31 2007, 02:00 PM, said:
Try a splitter without the amp.
alanh, on Jan 31 2007, 10:20 PM, said:
In that location it is extremely unlikely that there will be an overload of TV signals, however local FM transmitters are a different story.
AlanH
Why do you keep wanting to correct me when there is nothing to correct??
#43
Posted 01 February 2007 - 06:48 PM
At that non local distance, the only overload will be local, in this case FM transmitters not TV signals.
If a filter is used to remove the FM signals there would be no overload.
AlanH
#44
Posted 01 February 2007 - 07:18 PM
#45
Posted 09 February 2007 - 07:42 PM
#46
Posted 09 February 2007 - 11:52 PM
After you have made 10 posts send me a message using the new messages link and I will tell you what to do.
Do not buy a satellite dish.
AlanH
#47
Posted 10 February 2007 - 12:48 PM
alanh, on Feb 9 2007, 10:52 PM, said:
After you have made 10 posts send me a message using the new messages link and I will tell you what to do.
Do not buy a satellite dish.
AlanH
Thanks Alan, I don't see myself getting to 10 posts - as I don't know what anybody is talking about, I don't have much to contribute to this forum
#48
Posted 10 February 2007 - 05:09 PM
Roll down right to the bottom of the screen and click on the Problems? contact a human here and use the Email facility to ask for your messaging account to be activated.
AlanH
#49
Posted 10 February 2007 - 07:10 PM
alanh, on Feb 10 2007, 04:09 PM, said:
Roll down right to the bottom of the screen and click on the Problems? contact a human here and use the Email facility to ask for your messaging account to be activated.
AlanH
Tried that - it said I don't have permission to send an email....
#50
Posted 11 February 2007 - 11:49 AM
You only have 7 to go. Put all your future posts in the one strand.
AlanH









