Edited by alanh, 25 March 2013 - 11:35 AM.
Get The Best Reception - Melbourne
#1
Posted 25 November 2004 - 11:14 PM
#2
Posted 27 November 2004 - 11:49 PM
I want to add just one thing.
New Hills LNDA (Low Noise Digital Amplifier) masthead is excellent and they are designed for DTT.
I had a big problems with one of the installations recently (house behind the hill, big trees on the way, 4 points etc....). Couldn't do it with anything except Hills Digitel DL3, newest phased array beauty (can't find bloody paperwork for the name) and LNDA.
Signal was even a bit over the top so I had to attenuate it.
Unfortunatley, you have to play with attenuators coz LNDA have fixed gain. It can be used for separate VHF/UHF or combo antennas.
Cheers
scorpio
#3
Posted 29 November 2004 - 10:52 PM
Thanks for the complements. I am intending to this for all areas when I get the time!
From the photo on the Hills website, the DL3 is a log periodic VHF antenna, designed to receive channels 0 - 12. with a gain of 4-10 dB. With one small element the DY10 8-11 dB. The front to back ratio is much better. The advantage of this antenna is that it is not designed to receive channels below channel 6. This means it picks up much less interference from mains related systems and car ignitions.
I looked for the amplifier you quoted and cannot find it. Is it a distribution amplifier or a masthead amplifier? I have not recommended Hills amplifiers because the gain is less than Kingray, and not variable. They both use surface mounted components and claim to be digital compatible.
AlanH
#4
Posted 01 December 2004 - 12:44 AM
After adding LNDA (which is masthead), everything fell into place both signal strength and quality, like some kind of magic.
LNDA is not on their Web yet, as well as new UHF phased array.
Give them a call - John on 03 9238 2533, and ask for details.
Once more, you've done excellent job, m8.
Cheers
scorpio
#5
Posted 01 December 2004 - 11:57 PM
I am not in Melbourne. I will add it to my post when it is on their website so that any one can see what it looks like.
If you can encourage John to push to get it on the website Hills may make some more sales!
Could you also find out if they intend to modify the Band 3 phased array to increase its sensitivity on channels 11 & 12. It would have applications for long distance and blocked path sites where digital band 3 is used.
Thanks,
AlanH
#6
Posted 07 January 2005 - 11:35 AM
alanh, on Dec 1 2004, 11:57 PM, said:
YES!
I need something like that to further improve my reception, last time I looked there was no suitable antenna. Ideally this antenna would have a matched masthead amplifier with variable gain for each band, and a shielded masthead amp would be prefered. One input would be ok, since I only intend on using a combined antenna.
EDIT: Oh and I'm sick of terminating co-ax, so a package solution would be nice (ie. antenna, masthead and terminated co-ax supplied in one pretty cardboard box)
#7
Posted 07 January 2005 - 02:52 PM
From the testing that Les Field did, there is a drop of around 6 dB in channels 11 & 12 on the Hills CA16.
You have made me realise that I have not put masthead amplifier recommendations in the original post for Melbourne.
To amplify Band 3 only use
Kingray MHV44HLG It has 44 dB maximum gain, but it contains a diplexer as well. So you can feed an amplified UHF signal through it.
The gain is adjustable. So a drop of 6 dB is not huge in this context.
Kingray PSK08 connects the power to the amplifier at the receiver end through a plug pack.
http://www.gme.net.a...es.php#MHV44HLG
For Band 4 you need to use for Mt Dandenong (SBS..)
See http://www.gme.net.a.../mhu_series.php (Do not use MHU44BG5)
Band 5 which is used for translators.
http://www.gme.net.a...es.php#MHU44BG5
AlanH
#8
Posted 11 January 2005 - 05:11 PM
I hope I'm not rehashing something here but I live in Heathmont and have trees and a hill between me and Mt. Dandenong. This results in lost sound packets particuly on CH9. (Relocated or raising the antenna isn't an option).
As I have pretty much line of site to Como I thought I might point the antenna that way. Sshould it be vertically polarised? Suggestions on antenna model etc would be appreciated.
Thanks,
#9
Posted 11 January 2005 - 10:10 PM
Yes it is vertically polarised, and use a band 5 antenna
Fracarro 20RD5 11-14 dB
Hills TMX18 B5 11-16.5 dB
Wisi EB66 Ch 38-69 ≤16.5 dB (29º acceptance)
Log Periodic
Fracarro LP5HV 9.0 dB
http://www.hillsante.../UHFAntenna.pdf
http://www.fracarro..../0/Antennas.pdf
The higher the number of dB the more sensitive and more directional.
AlanH
#10
Posted 12 January 2005 - 08:22 AM
alanh, on Jan 11 2005, 11:10 PM, said:
Yes it is vertically polarised, and use a band 5 antenna
Fracarro 20RD5 11-14 dB
Hills TMX18 B5 11-16.5 dB
Wisi EB66 Ch 38-69 ≤16.5 dB (29º acceptance)
Log Periodic
Fracarro LP5HV 9.0 dB
http://www.hillsante.../UHFAntenna.pdf
http://www.fracarro..../0/Antennas.pdf
The higher the number of dB the more sensitive and more directional.
AlanH
Much apreciated. Thanks for the prompt response.
nerve_center
#11
Posted 21 January 2005 - 11:33 PM
I am almost in line of sight for upwey albeit below the tree line
behind Mt Dandenong and slightly around the corner for ferntree gully, I think the selby station may be above and along the gully
I have a set top box topfield with reasonable ok signal but not great, loose a bit of channel 10 sometimes, and anoluge signal not very good
with a 4 way powered kingray splitter sam204dp, with 1 connection sofar - want to have 3 connections, antenna currently is a phased array with 4 sets of "fingers"
similar to this http://www.dse.com.a...duct/View/L3087
I have only manually aligned signal with rough line of sight to where I "think" tower is. mounted off fascia
I had originally used selby but then lost channel 10 altogether, but had reasonable analouge signal now pointed towards ferntree gully, only reasonable result now
also what approx cost for an installer to "tune" antenna would I expect
thanks Grant
#12
Posted 22 January 2005 - 02:04 PM
Be nice if Hills site in Australia updated to showcase their new products, eg only became aware of Ultimax 36 U [WISI EE06 clone] when seen in local distributor's store.
#13
Posted 22 January 2005 - 04:08 PM
Send me your street address via the My contols messaging on this site (This will maintain privacy for us both. Use my member name alanh. I will give you the direction. You will need a compass which is secured to a piece of wood to keep it from the metal work of the antenna.
AlanH
#14
Posted 22 January 2005 - 04:48 PM
kiwi_aus, on Jan 21 2005, 11:33 PM, said:
I am almost in line of sight for upwey albeit below the tree line
behind Mt Dandenong and slightly around the corner for ferntree gully, I think the selby station may be above and along the gully
I have a set top box topfield with reasonable ok signal but not great, loose a bit of channel 10 sometimes, and anoluge signal not very good
with a 4 way powered kingray splitter sam204dp, with 1 connection sofar - want to have 3 connections, antenna currently is a phased array with 4 sets of "fingers"
similar to this http://www.dse.com.a...duct/View/L3087
I have only manually aligned signal with rough line of sight to where I "think" tower is. mounted off fascia
I had originally used selby but then lost channel 10 altogether, but had reasonable analouge signal now pointed towards ferntree gully, only reasonable result now
also what approx cost for an installer to "tune" antenna would I expect
thanks Grant
Grant, why don't you use the signal level / quality bars in your set top box (not ideal but better than guessing) as a guide to which transmitter and antenna position. When I did antenna work in your area years ago I was struck by the difficulty of the terrain and that sometimes the reception would be better from an unexpected direction. That can be truer than ever now all Melbourne secondary services (Selby, Upwey, FertreeGully, ArthursSeat, RosebudSouth) use the same channels for digital in an innovative Single Frequency Network. So regardless of AlanH's observations from afar, you could find a most unlikely antenna position to give you the best result. It might take an hour or 2 of shouting 'hows that?' but it holds promise!
#15
Posted 22 January 2005 - 09:12 PM
PM me the nearest intersection to your house and I'll try and help.
Steve
#16
Posted 22 January 2005 - 09:57 PM
I had roughly setup using the set top signal level
what annoys me is I HAD a good signal from selby - no changes, then out of the blue I lose SBS... could live with that, then channel 10 goes too
I also had good anilogue no matter what I did couldn't get it back
I still plan to raise the antenna in the future
Quote
#17
Posted 22 January 2005 - 11:45 PM
I don't know if you've driven up Belmont Avenue, it's off Morris just up from the town centre. The translator is next to the old lookout tower, near the corner of Highcliff Road.
One of my antenna is similar to yours - pointed at Selby as previously stated. I also have intermittent problems with SBS, Channel 7 and Channel 10. 7 & 10 I can substitute with the Mt Dandenong reception but SBS I only get from Selby (although SBS I can get via Foxtel Digital satellite).
Hope it helps, good luck.
Steve
#18
Posted 27 February 2005 - 12:02 PM
marcj, on Jan 22 2005, 02:04 PM, said:
Be nice if Hills site in Australia updated to showcase their new products, eg only became aware of Ultimax 36 U [WISI EE06 clone] when seen in local distributor's store.
Funny you had to go to a NZ site to look at what an Australian company produces.
Is it a masthead amp? the pics in the pdf dont show it to be?
If it is a masthead amp, what stops water from entering the switch?
also why is ch1 to 3 amplified?
#19
Posted 31 March 2005 - 05:23 PM
I'm in Forest Park Road (at the bottom of the hill from where the Upwey transmitter appears to be), have a mass of trees in the way, extremely poor analog reception and marginal digital reception. I have a Yagi antenna (set correctly for vertical polarisation), have installed quad shielded RG6, F-type connectors (on everything except the power injector, the antenna and masthead amp) and raised the antenna on a 6m pole.
All of this has made very marginal improvements to my reception, except the reception appeared to drop on some channels when I raised the antenna.
I have two digital receivers currently. A topfield set top box, and a linux based PVR using two Twinhan HD cards (which I build and sell as part of my business). Since, I'm selling these systems, obviously I want to have good reception on which to demonstrate them (hence all the work I've done so far).
My current reception is as follows: By turning my antenna I can get crystal clear pictures on ABC and SBS all of the time with garbage on the commercial channels all of the time OR I can get a reasonably good picture on ABC and the commercial channels most of the time but zero signal on SBS all of the time. I'm not sure what's going on there, as I thought there was only 1 Upwey transmitter for all channels.
According to the Topfield STB, I have 100% signal (with the amp turned all the way up) but no signal if I turn the amp down. Same story if I disconnect the power injector. According to MythTV's setup program, I get around 35-37% SNR and 29-31% Signal Strength (although the readings are considered to be anecdotal at best). I can get a good picture on the STB on all SD channels but nothing in HD (which it's capable of receiving, but not capable of displaying in full resolution). The MythTV PVR reception is what really needs resolving.
Any help and/or advice would be appreciated.
#20
Posted 31 March 2005 - 05:37 PM
#21
Posted 31 March 2005 - 11:27 PM
Two things;
Mast head amplifier must be mounted close to the antenna, so in your case about 300 mm below.
The amplifier examples I gave are for the Main Transmitter in each area. In your case this is irrelevant and so you can get another 10 dB gain and less noise if it is mounted under the antenna.
You need to use a http://www.gme.net.a...es.php#MHU44BG5
You did not say what type of antenna you are using and whether there is terrain in the way.
Location:Lookout Tower TV translator site Belmont Avenue UPWEY
poidahl,
This is up to the community, although, the actual location of the antenna can be important as you say.
A
#22
Posted 01 April 2005 - 01:15 PM
poidahl, on Mar 31 2005, 5:37 PM, said:
alanh, on Mar 31 2005, 11:27 PM, said:
Two things;
Mast head amplifier must be mounted close to the antenna, so in your case about 300 mm below.
alanh, on Mar 31 2005, 11:27 PM, said:
You need to use a http://www.gme.net.a...es.php#MHU44BG5
alanh, on Mar 31 2005, 11:27 PM, said:
Now that I've raised the mast, I don't think there is actual terrain in the way. But there are a lot of trees in the way. I have considered trying to point at Selby, but there is almost definitely terrain in the way heading that direction and I'd need to change the polarity of the antenna (a major PITA when it's on top of a 6m pole).
alanh, on Mar 31 2005, 11:27 PM, said:
If you look at this map, I'm on Forest Park Road, just east of the Tasman Avenue intercection. Unfortunately, whereis is horribly slow via my ISP (or it may just be whereis).
#23
Posted 01 April 2005 - 09:16 PM
I suggest you go for a drive up Belmont Av. I have been in your area, but I do not live anywhere near you. North could easily be a possibility.
If you think the trees are a real problem then a phased array will be better. The longest axis of the whole antenna will be horizontal.
AlanH
#24
Posted 01 April 2005 - 09:19 PM
I suggest you go for a drive up Belmont Av. I have been in your area, but I do not live anywhere near you. North could easily be a possibility.
Phased Arrays
This type of antenna is much more directional in the horizontal direction when used for vertical polarisation. The longest axis of the whole antenna will be horizontal.
If you use a yagi, and the transmitter antenna is above you don't forget to point the antenna upwards, because it is much more directional in the vertical direction
AlanH
#25
Posted 02 April 2005 - 11:09 AM
the other tower is as you suppect a mobile tower, pointing towards that will give you approx. towards the mt dandenong tower, but thats over the hill and on the other side of the dandenong peak also, also thats horizontal and so is selby,
having said that I've had a phased array mounted vertically pointed at mt dandy and had reasonably good signal ( forgot to reorintate it)










